Comment on Deloitte will refund Australian government for AI hallucination-filled report

frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

• Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  And a partial refund at that.

  Better option would be to require the senior Deloitte partners and manager to do real community service program (live-in junior janitor at homeless shelter or a hospice) for 6 months (with an assets freeze for the duration of community service).

  source

  • N0t_5ure@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    It’s ridiculous. The fact that a significant part of the report was clearly fraudulent calls into question the merit of the entire report. How could anyone take it seriously after finding dozens of fraudulent sources? They should sue to recover 100% of what was paid.

    source

    • Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      I still think personal responsibility (as outlined in my post above) is a far better option that a fine.

      A fine is the cost of business. I don’t think a senior Deloitte partner or manager would like to say do a 6 month mandatory de-mining community service program.

      source

      • Hupf@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

        mandatory de-mining

        Image

        source
      • phutatorius@lemmy.zip ⁨21⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        Partners and managers (at least senior ones) are held accountable for profitability. A fine directly hits their bonuses. But holding the partners personally liable for fraud would be a good thing to do as well.

        source