That’s not a bad point. Many options exist to offload property though, including bulldozing a mansion on 10acres that no one is buying and turning it into a housing sub division
Comment on How would a wealth tax affect real estate rentals?
atro_city@fedia.io 3 weeks agoThe idea is to make the wealthy sell some of their assets. Thus driving the price of those assets down. If people horde fewer houses, the market of buyers shrinks and prices fall.
But who will they be selling to? I imagine it will be people who actually want to live in their homes, not just rent them out. Wouldn't that reduce the number of available homes people can rent?
Brkdncr@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
atro_city@fedia.io 3 weeks ago
Good point! Yes, larger estates could be sold to be used for housing multiple people or indeed for building new housing. Thank you
Steve@communick.news 3 weeks ago
Maybe. Mostly it’ll drive down the rent, since the homes are worth less.
andrewta@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Is my logic it would reduce the number of homes available for rent. More people would be able to own. Because more homes in the market would be available. But people would be buying them to live in them. We literally can’t build homes fast enough. Every time there’s a downturn in the market building of homes slows down. And that puts us even further behind.
atro_city@fedia.io 3 weeks ago
My concern was that not everybody can afford to buy a house, but back in the day people on a receptionist income could buy a house, so if we go back to those days, house ownership would rise again. And as others made me realise, the stuff standing empty for investment would be sold to be used again and outsized homes could be sold to be repurposed as social housing or jousing outright.