That sounds like putting the cart before the horse. I would say that Frankenstein Abhors his creation, and does not name it because of it. I don’t think if he’d named it Greg or something, that he’d actually treat His monster any better.
Comment on Frankenbeans
littletoolshed@lemmy.world 15 hours agoPart of Frankenstein’s rejection of his creation is the fact that he does not give him a name. Instead, Frankenstein’s creation is referred to by words such as “wretch”, “monster”, “creature”, “demon”, “devil”, “fiend”, and “it”. When Frankenstein converses with the creature, he addresses him as “vile insect”, “abhorred monster”, “fiend”, “wretched devil”, and “abhorred devil”.
JayDee@lemmy.sdf.org 15 hours ago
primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus 11 hours ago
Accurate to real life parenting.
Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 12 hours ago
An abusive parent is still a parent. Unfortunately. The Creature doesn’t have to keep the name, but should be the heir to whatever is left of the family fortune and fortress.
lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 hours ago
And Victor should keep the interpretational sovereignty?
snooggums@piefed.world 14 hours ago
Why would monster want to take on that name?
Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 12 hours ago
Maybe if it’s entailed to the inheritance.
lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 hours ago
Asking the real question
Colonel_Panic_@eviltoast.org 14 hours ago
Typical parent.