Comment on Political discourse

• mathemachristian@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Firstly this concept only applies to means of production, as in the stuff that is used to produce stuff which could be sold. So e. g. a sewing machine.

  Without getting into the weeds:

  a. Personal: You own and operate the sewing machine, you pay for the resources consumed and own the item produced. (Good)

  b. Private: You own the sewing machine but someone else operates it. You pay the resources consumed, the laborer a previously agreed upon amount and own the item they produced. (bad)

  c. Public: the public owns the sewing machine and pays for the resources consumed. The laborer is paid the value of their work. That is, the value of the item produced minus the value of the resources consumed. (Very good)

  How “the public” and “the value” are determined is the source of leftist infighting (anarchists vs marxist-leninist). But since both agree that private ownership needs to be abolished the call is for leftist unity to stand together against the people that currently own the means of production privately (the bourgeoisie) and exploit those that have to sell their laborforce in order to survive (the proletariat).

  source

  • HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    thanks for the refresher! i have worked in too many similar fields with bullshit jargon where they have basically made homophones antonyms just to fuck with anyone who decides to get uppity and do anything cross-discipline so now my brain is:
    Image
    it’s one of those “i know i learned this somewhere, and i’ll remember in 3 days i’m sure!” things so thanks for helping a fellow out.

    source

    • mathemachristian@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      No issue, here is a good intro to Marxism if you want it www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/…/index.htm

      source