mathemachristian
@mathemachristian@lemmy.blahaj.zone
- Comment on Top of the world, ma 3 days ago:
Huh? You sure you got the time line right? Because I’m commenting about the “carnist intellectuals ITT” after they already went off with the standardized DIN-ISO-VegAn-Jokes A1-A4
- Comment on Top of the world, ma 3 days ago:
The sherpas don’t have that much choice what with needing money to survive and the nepalese economy being what it is.
- Comment on Top of the world, ma 3 days ago:
I have never had a babyeater not immediately start crying about “the nasty vegans who will never convert anyone with this kind of language 😭😭😭” when there was a clapback. You lot act like we can’t take shitposting but you just rehash the same 3 jokes or so and whine about obnoxious, judgemental vegans the moment the teenciest bit of fire returned. Must be all that milk that got you acting like babies 🤷
- Comment on Top of the world, ma 3 days ago:
Kindest carnist
- Comment on Top of the world, ma 3 days ago:
So you’re saying the ones who call nonchristians “sinners” are correct?
- Comment on Top of the world, ma 3 days ago:
Huh? What vegan is causing everyone here to act like a stereotype? The one who climbed everest, or one of the vegans who started commenting after all these carnists had made all the canon jokes already
- Comment on Top of the world, ma 3 days ago:
Unironically the most respectful carnist I’ve met
- Comment on Top of the world, ma 3 days ago:
I should note, although it’s not directly relevant to your point, that “people who eat vegetables (instead of meat)” are also called vegetarian. The precise degree to which oppression of animals is tolerable was a contencious debate among vegetarians, which led to the creation of “The Vegan Society” to rally those that argued for “no oppression at all”. So even though dairy and egg farming require animal murder (to deal with the newborns considered a “byproduct”) vegetarians don’t object to those.
Vegans however take the idea that animals are thinking, feeling creatures to its logical conclusion and will argue for no animal products anywhere. No leather, no beeswax, no brushes with animal hair, no trips to the zoo, no pets and so on. It’s very much not just the diet, although that is of course a huge part of it.
- Comment on Top of the world, ma 3 days ago:
weirdly defensive too, your conscience nagging again bud 🤔
- Comment on Top of the world, ma 3 days ago:
Don’t have to really, our existence is already deeply upsetting lol. But even if, how are you going to change society if you keep it to yourself
- Comment on Top of the world, ma 3 days ago:
The point behind not using “nonvegan” is that it frames carnists as "the normal"s and the “vegans” as the one who have “something special” going on. This is true with celiac and nonceliac, lactose intolerant and not lactose intolerant. But we argue that veganism, i.e. not killing if unnecessary, is the normal thing to do. That the only reason it doesn’t seem that way is because it got normalized through repetition and how widespread it is.
- Comment on Top of the world, ma 3 days ago:
I mean in the same way as “terf” I guess
- Comment on Top of the world, ma 3 days ago:
Carnist is a description of someone who has a meat-inclusive diet, other descriptions of people by what they can or cannot eat are e.g. vegan, lactose intolerant, celiac… It’s not a “name” you call someone, it’s a description of someone using a certain aspect of them relevant to the discussion.
A “name”, as in, something used to insult would be e.g. corpsemuncher, bloodmouth, cheesebreth &c.
- Comment on Top of the world, ma 3 days ago:
Huh? What would you call someone who cares about animal exploitation, and what should we call those that don’t?
- Comment on Top of the world, ma 3 days ago:
I’m not sure what you’re trying to say here, you don’t want me to take this “so serious” everyone here is just pretending to be a carnist? I’m not surprised at all, why would I be, it’s like this every time a vegan is mentioned.
- Comment on Top of the world, ma 4 days ago:
bro vegans are so dumb they’re depriving themselves of key nutrients and become weak and constantly tired.
that’s wrong, let me prove it to you by climbing the fucking everest
bro vegans are so annoying and why won’t they shut the fuck up about it
the carnist intellectuals have come out in force I see
- Comment on Im curious what they will come up with 5 days ago:
my brother in christ who is “everyone”? It’s just you and me in a comment chain so deep that the left side is about to wrap around the rainbow for a second time.
I have not accused you of bigotry, certainly not for disagreeing with me. I can only repeat: I have only condemned the vile transphobes Matt Stone and Trey Parker. And I think I made the reason for why I think this plain.
Youre jumping at ghosts, maybe a breath of cold air would help? Calm down, come back and please tell me what south park jokes portraying the ridiculousness of political correctness you meant 😭
- Comment on Im curious what they will come up with 5 days ago:
Is “running cover for” not an idiom for “defending”?? Is that not what you were doing with
Ignoring the ridiculousness of the politically correct wouldn’t have kept the republicans from winning.
as a reply to someone saying “fuck those assholes”?? I feel like I’ve taken crazy pills,
Please in plain english, was that not a defense of south park and their humor? To which jokes of theirs about “political correctness” where you referring???
I am genuinely completely lost, did you maybe post an answer meant for someone else somewhere up in the thread and we have been talking about two completely different things?
- Comment on Im curious what they will come up with 5 days ago:
What verdict??? What’s going on? You talked about some anti-“political correctness” jokes, these are the ones most would think about. Which ones did you mean?
- Comment on Im curious what they will come up with 5 days ago:
what
who did I condemn other than the vile transphobes Trey Parker and Matt Stone?
I thought I was being pretty polite considering your weirdly defensive snarkiness
- Comment on Im curious what they will come up with 5 days ago:
yeah, south park creators are vile transphobes, as that episode clearly demonstrates and therefore everyone running cover for their south park is running cover for vile transphobes.
However it so clearly is not just that episode. The visual style chosen for mrs. garrison is the plainest “man-in-a-dress” transphobic trope that was on for seasons.
the “mr. slave” homophobia??? “Lol gay people loving shoving stuff up their ass” Like come on. It’s all edgy 4chan humor.
How about you come up with some witty well-deserved jokes they made up about the “politically correct” crowd?
- Comment on Im curious what they will come up with 5 days ago:
The dolphinoplasty episode is extremely vile transphobia. These are the kind of jokes you’re talking about when you say they make fun of political correctness
- Comment on Im curious what they will come up with 5 days ago:
no offense but you’re running cover for some vile transphobes
- Comment on Checkmate, atheists! You are going to vagina hell! 1 week ago:
Signing up for the helldivers division right now blobcat, sweats
- Comment on Notepad++ Hijacked by State-Sponsored Hackers 1 week ago:
Emacs
- Comment on ...is this retro? 1 week ago:
It was a meme when the 360 got released.
- Comment on ...is this retro? 1 week ago:
I thought it was called the 360 because when you see it you turn 360 degrees and walk away.
- Comment on YSK: ICE is MURDERING in the streets! 4 weeks ago:
White lives no longer considered sacred? Who could have seen that coming??
- Comment on Banana 3 months ago:
I mean the queerphobia, ableism and racism in Arrested Development is off the charts, and a lot if not all of the cultural references no longer hold up, so I wouldn’t recommend it. The office, well, it’s not great but it’s not as bad if you need some slop to play in the background.
- Comment on FACTS 3 months ago:
Guess what humans are lol