A strawman is taking someone’s genuine argument and then distorting or misrepresenting it to make it easier to attack. A strawman argument isn’t valid and it isn’t paraphrasing. Generally when people paraphrase in good faith, they will ask if they said the paraphrase correctly and will correct themselves if it is incorrect.

They cannot remove just anything, they have to have a legal basis to do so and can be sued, less government control than now.

I said propaganda warfare, meaning online propaganda warfare that started in 2016, a new type of warfare. Obviously.

Again, it is less control than what exists presently already via private companies that would still exist later anyway. We still can advocate for progress even within capitalism and fascism, that’s how we dig out of both.

Propaganda warfare in my comment is specifically referencing online warfare since 2016, and it is absolutely Putin’s baby.

You did slightly better on this comment in terms of nonsensical spewing, nice