yeah these drone conveyances are not exactly like the moller concept.
Comment on Flying cars crash into each other at Chinese air show
stephen01king@piefed.zip 2 weeks ago
Is that even a car? It just looks like a massive drone.
HubertManne@piefed.social 2 weeks ago
ilillilillilillililli@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Cars travel on the ground. These are indeed massive drones with the capacity to lift humans. The media won’t give up “The Jetsons” flying car term (regardless of how impractical and unsafe the concept of layman operating in 3D space is). These are just electric, multi-rotor aircraft. My rant is over.
Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
I don’t know about your definition. The term comes from a two-wheeled chariot it seems (though the etymology of that seems to be a word meaning “to run”). It’s been used from everything from chariots, to train cars, to street cars, to automobiles. They all share two things in common. They’re an enclosed container meant to carry things, and they’ve got wheels.
I don’t think the wheel thing is fundamental to the definition anymore. Anything traveling on the ground is going to have wheels. The “flying” part let’s you know how it travels, the car part informs you about the utility. I think it’s perfectly clear what it means. What else should we call it that’d be more clear?
FauxLiving@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Autonomous ultralight electric quad rotary aircraft rolls off the tongue quite well.