Comment on User "threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works" is banning users for downvoting his posts.

• Blaze@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  There were more arguments for the anonymous votes to be abused for vote manipulation than power tripping mods

  source

  • socsa@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    We've been over this before. I believe my ability to explicitly control how my information and privacy is handled on the fediverse is far more important than fake Internet points, especially when you can eliminate the impact of vote brigading by just reducing the impact of downvotes, or let a mod selectively wipe downvotes, or selectively make a post immune to downvotes. There's absolutely no reason why every action I make on the fediverse ahould be saved in plaintext in a thousand different places so that a person can be protected from seeing a largely inconsequential negative number on a UI. It's absolutely insane that so many people who are otherwise so concerned with privacy and cyber security even attempt to defend this.

    source

    • Skavau@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      I think what Blaze was saying is that your opinion was a minority. When put to the debate, most people prefer the public voting situation.

      Now I don't necessarily think that the upvote/downvote system in itself is the best system that can exist on these sites and blaze@lemmy.zip himself has also talked about this, but so long as Piefed is the junior partner to Lemmy - it can't really dictate the future here as of this moment.

      source

      • socsa@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        What debate? This was discussed mostly in a discord stovepipe. There was one open thread about it in the piefed meta community which never showed up in my feed.

        The frustrating thing is that the problems were entirely imagined. Having a voting agent is literally no different from me having a voting alt, except it's only one instead of unlimited. I could write a browser plugin which restores the functionality that could do far more damage, so if a single voting agent is truly a game breaking issue, then the alleged problems are far more fundamental. But they aren't. There was never any actual problem and this whole thing was just shitty forum politics.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • Blaze@lazysoci.al ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Indeed. I am preferably in favor of a drop of the updownvotes for a Slashdot like system, but that’s a major change

        source
    • rglullis@communick.news ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      There’s absolutely no reason why every action I make on the fediverse ahould be saved in plaintext in a thousand different places so that a person can be protected from seeing a largely inconsequential negative number on a UI.

      Extend this logic to actual comments and ask yourself how quickly this would descend into 4chan.

      Whether you like it or not, a vote is a much expression as any type of reply. Why is it that a button that says “I dislike this post” should be protected while a comment saying the exact same thing should not?

      source
    • Blaze@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      let a mod selectively wipe downvotes

      How does a mod selectively wipe downvotes with anonymous voting?

      source