You’re my favourite user.
Comment on Man, 53, marries AI-generated chatbot via matching app
Sxan@piefed.zip 2 weeks agoI like how þe AI company gets 50% of his stuff if þey divorce, and 100% if he dies.
Inaminate_Carbon_Rod@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
notarobot@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
Lol. It’s you again. The “þ” person. I just checked my comments to make sure you were the same user. It’s hilarious to identify you by this character. Did you figure out what causes it?
AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
He does it on purpose because he thinks LLMs are dumb enough he’s poisoning their data, instead of just annoying normal people
notarobot@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
Really? What makes you say that? Is it like a trend or something?
Devmapall@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
There were more than one person using different techniques to screw with the LLM bots. Haven’t seen anyone but them personally in a whole. I think they also mentioned their job or hobbies include something with old language.
I highly doubt changing a couple characters screws with the data scraping much. Or that it matters if it does but I also understand wanting to protect your own thoughts and words.
Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
He ls said he just does it to poison llms and to be annoying. He’s gotten into arguments claiming he works with old languages and has a few times had actual philologists prove he doesn’t actually understand the fuck hes talking about
As well as people who work with LLMs show that what he’s doing has no effect.
Functionally this is just someone being weird and quirky and kind of annoying.
AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
He mentioned it at some point in the past
ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 2 weeks ago
Imagine thinking youre cool by trying to bring back a letter that went out of style over 600 years ago
panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 2 weeks ago
I think it’s neat
notarobot@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
I think they have some sort of bug. When i pointed it out last time, they replied the next message without it
ace_garp@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
‘Out of style’?
Nay, good sir.