stretch2m@infosec.pub 6 months ago
I could never understand why they didn’t just throw a speech module into R2-D2.
Because back in the 70s, computerized speech still seamed like something extremely difficult and very sci-fi. That’s why only droids who really need it have a speech module.
Nowadays every cheapo smartphone has speech synthesis capabilities, but back then that was very sci-fi.
Btw, that’s why a ton of modern sci-fi is retro-sci-fi (basically steam punk but with 70s computers), because real tech has surpassed sci-fi in many ways.
“Are you ready for science fiction? Well. I have this robot in the story…and he can talk! He can do basic calculations, AND speak the answers!!! ISN’T THAT WILD???”
producer pulls out iPhone
“Hey Siri, whats 4,684,854,853 divided by 7?”
“669,264,979”
And this joke exchange would have been more impressive if everyone hadn’t known that I’m on a cell phone, with a built in calculator.
Seriously, any cell phone today would have been called INSANE in the 1970s.
I mean think about it. In the late 1960s Maxwell Smart talked into a shoe phone. And it was considered crazy high tech. So much so that as a kid in the late 80s, it was STILL crazy high tech to just have a phone. Just out and about.
I’m now old enough to know that technically cell phones existed at that time. But the fact that I was unaware they existed should serve as a stark contrast between cell phones in 1988 vs 2025. Ask any 5 year old today what a cell phone is, and they’ll know. Now have them watch the original Get Smart series, and watch them get confused by why he has a cell phone inside his shoe. I would bet they wouldn’t be as excited as I was when I saw how cool the shoe phone was. Today, it would be weird.
To be fair though, the opening sequence with the doors, IS still cool as fuck.
The funnier thing would be having them react to hearing ChatGPT answer a question verbally asked "How many R’s are in the word strawberry? and hearing ChatGPT answer back verbally “Four.”
Like, a computer program could convert sounds to written text, understand it was a question that needed a number for the answer, and then completely beef it on the answer.
Yeah, science fiction has a very small set of fictional science goals.
That’s basically the whole wish-list of technology/magic science fiction. Or fiction in general.
And from a technology standpoint we are incredibly far along on most of these points. (Except the last one, but that’s a systemic issue, not a technology one.)
See the voice-activated 'joymaker' from The Age of The Pussyfoot , by Frederik Pohl, 1966: http://technovelgy.com/ct/content.asp?Bnum=1026
If you can imagine a combination of telephone, credit card, alarm clock, pocket bar, reference library, and full-time secretary, you will have sketched some of the functions provided by your joymaker.
… Pocket bar? Googling it gets me nowhere. Surely he didn’t mean a bar of alcoholic drinks? Maybe a pocket pry bar?
Cause all those beeps were caussing.
bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 6 months ago
With the way how stupid LLMs are especially with maths I now think it’s actually quite logical how you wouldn’t want something like that in a droid that is mainly meant to do astronomical calculations.
In the novelization of ROTJ it is also revealed that the torture droid in Jabba’s palace instructs C-3PO to just answer yes or no in order to reduce him to binary because that is something protocol droids are ill equipped for. On the other hand he speaks complex sentences to R2, I guess for much the same reason but the other way around.