Comment on if hate is categorically bad, then any sort of negativity is also bad. Even the word bad is bad. Being anti-hate actually has drawbacks

• quacky@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Right, that was certainly Aristotle’s interpretation on the concept of magnanimity. Aristotle claimed to have said, "He [who is magnanimous] must be open both in love and in hate, since concealment shows timidity; and care more for the truth than for what people will think; and speak and act openly, since as he despises other men he is outspoken and frank, except when speaking with ironical self-deprecation, as he does to common people… " (I got this quote from Wikipedia entry of Magnaimity who got it from this link www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3At… ) However, Aristotle was born before the greek (then rome) stoics. Some stoics thought that being human was transcending pain-pleasure, love-hate, into a more rational plane of existence. Here’s a quote by Stoic Marcus Aurelius, “… the Magnanimity is the elevation of the intelligent part above the pleasurable or painful sensations of the flesh, and above that poor thing called fame, and death, and all such things.” In conclusion, there are differing views of what virtue means, for Aristotle it means something close to good judgement / wisdom of how to moderate one’s actions while for the stoics it means acting rationally despite hardship and embracing life in its entirety.

  source

  • ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Is this an LLM? 🫩

    source

    • quacky@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Can you articulate this suspicion? Do I need to speak inauthentic so that you don’t falsely accuse me?

      source

      • vatlark@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        This user was reported for being an LLM. I do agree that they have a very thorough writing style that is uncommon.

        source

        • -> View More Comments