I’d say it is, since atproto is, at the very least, open.
Comment on On discourse and decentralisation
rimu@piefed.social 1 month ago
All this rests on the implied assertion that ATProto is part of the open social web.
irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
Kirk@startrek.website 5 weeks ago
It’s “open” in the same way that cryptocurrencies are “open”. It doesn’t matter how technically decentralized the power structure is when someone owns more than 99% of the tokens.
Blaze@lemmy.zip 1 month ago
Comment explaining how to create an account without any of the Bluesky infra:
Example of independent ATProto platform: blackskyweb.xyz
Ulrich@feddit.org 1 month ago
Is it “open” sure, but not in any meaningful way as long as 99.99% of users are hosted by the same server.
wisdomchicken@piefed.social 1 month ago
open social web is used here as a descriptive term, to mean the collection of networks that includes activitypub, atproto, nostr (and potentially more like matrix and farcaster, depending on your inclination).
whether open social web is the correct term or not does not really matter, because if it was not than i would simply have to replace it with another term that describes the exact same thing