It really whips the llamas ass.
Comment on It's Not Just You: Music Streaming Is Broken Now
sturmblast@lemmy.world 1 month ago
As much as I know Spotify isn’t great for artists, I do find it to be the best streaming option for how I enjoy music. Next to Winamp of course.
Mister_Hangman@lemmy.world 1 month ago
sturmblast@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
You are goddamn right it does.
Kolanaki@pawb.social 1 month ago
I wish Winamp was on Android so I could use it on my phone, too. Especially if it had Milkdrop Visualizer.
tal@lemmy.today 1 month ago
Especially if it had Milkdrop Visualizer.
I wouldn’t be suprised if there’s a ProjectM port. It’s in Debian.
checks
Yup. Not on F-Droid, though.
play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.psperl.…
github.com/projectM-visualizer/projectm
projectM is an open-source project that reimplements the esteemed Winamp Milkdrop by Geiss in a more modern, cross-platform reusable library.
pezhore@infosec.pub 1 month ago
That’s what I did for my wedding - shoutcast with a requests plugin so the wedding party and guests could choose what songs to play.
glorkon@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Spotify’s streaming quality is, regrettably, rather low, even if you pay for a monthly subscription.
I switched to Tidal when I bought a dedicated DAC and a pair of very highend headphones and have not regretted it - you can hear the difference on good gear.
Dozzi92@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I have great gear, I have FLACs, I have 180g records, and I have Spotify, and they all sound fine. Perhaps I come from a time when 192 mp3s were what you downloaded, but IMO if it’s a 320 mp3 or above it sounds the same. Only time I ever noticed and appreciated a difference was when sampling or mixing, and then higher quality can be appreciated, but if I’m just cranking tunes, Spotify, FLAC, or vinyl, really makes no difference, they all drown out the ringing in my ears just fine.
glorkon@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Looks like your ears’ hearing profile matches the psychoacoustic models underlying lossy compression algorithms very closely.
That’s the thing many people don’t understand - lossy audio compression works better for you the more your ears match the average human ear.
In my case, being an older fuck with slight hearing deficiencies, I don’t match this profile as closely. That’s why I require higher bitrates (or lossless compression such as FLAC) for music to sound high quality.
So yeah - listening experience isn’t just a matter of taste, it’s highly subjective and will vary from person to person. For people like me, the difference between low-res streaming and FLAC is very noticeable, and ironically not because my ears are better, but because they’re worse than yours. :)
HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Same. In my younger days, I couldn’t really tell much difference between mp3 and CD. Now? I can absolutely tell.
Yea, 320mp3 sounds close but if the music has a lot of very low or very high frequency music, mp3 seems to clip it off, even 320.
Opus seems to handle the extreme ranges better though. But if you have an MP3, and convert it, it’s no better. Converting lossy to lossy is a no win outcome.
Iamaquantummechanic@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I listen to punk music recorded on crappy gear, so I prefer not to hear it hi-fi.
glorkon@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Crappy punk music should be listened to from vinyl anyway.
Iamaquantummechanic@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Or cassette
sturmblast@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Yeah but Spotify does now offer 24-bit/44.1 kHz FLAC as their highest now, which is fine for most any system. And they have 30+ million more songs. Using both is probably the best option in many ways, but for my tastes Spotify hasn’t been beat. I can find things on Spotify I can get on other platforms and that’s important to me.
glorkon@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
That came in the news literally after I wrote my previous comment. FLAC is great of course, because it’s lossless.
If you google Tidal vs Spotify song count, though, you’ll find sources which say Tidal has more songs than Spotify. I’ve found everything I want on Tidal as well.