Comment on Can we please stop arguing about whether Bluesky is decentralized?

• Die4Ever@retrolemmy.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Well 25% is very strict, pretty sure mastodon.social is more than that for the Fediverse

  But yea anything higher than 75% is kinda missing the point, ideally if anyone hit 50% they would close signups and suggest people signup on alternatives instead lol

  join-lemmy.org actually hides any instance of 30% of Lemmy github.com/LemmyNet/…/instances.tsx#L451-L456

  source

  • airportline@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    ideally they would close signups and suggest people signup on alternatives instead

    Is that what you would actually expect Bluesky to do if they were committed to decentralization?

    source

    • Die4Ever@retrolemmy.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      I said “ideally”, but they probably would’ve done a lot of things differently if they were committed to decentralization

      source
    • irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      Bluesky traded good user distribution for growth.

      source
• irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Doesn’t LW control ~30% of the lemmyverse?

  source

  • LodeMike@lemmy.today ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Lemmyverse != threadiverse

    source

    • irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      It controls ~30% of the threadiverse, then.

      source

      • LodeMike@lemmy.today ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

        Where is that number coming from?

        source

        • -> View More Comments