Matrix has a profitable business model that doesn’t involve exploiting users. BlueSky doesn’t.
Comment on Can we please stop arguing about whether Bluesky is decentralized?
omniman@anarchist.nexus 1 month agowhat about matrix , they also do business
Ulrich@feddit.org 1 month ago
alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
There is a difference between providing services to fund development and “We take VC capital now and try to make it profitable later”, which just invites enshittification.
Also Matrix is much better federated than BS + everything is open and was so for a long time
poVoq@slrpnk.net 1 month ago
Slightly better you mean. 30% is on matrix.org and an estimated 70% runs on servers provided by EMS (this figure includes matrix.org).
And Matrix is also VC funded. They have some other income yes, but it is insufficient to fund many of their current activities.
alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
Matrix.org is VC funded (which is why it will go freemium soon AFAIK) and not 99% is on Matrix.org as you mentioned
I can freely and easily federate with any other homeserver to matrix.org
irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
I can freely and easily federate with *.bsky.network and bsky.app.
Kirk@startrek.website 1 month ago
Don’t let them distract with with the “whattabout matrix”. The Matrix Foundation is not a social media company, and furthermore it’s a nonprofit.