Microsoft’s interest in Nokia was being able to compete with what is now a dupopoly between Google and Apple in phones. They wanted to own a mobile platform. I am very confident that they did not want their project to flop. That being said, they’ll have had their own concerns and interests. Maybe Nokia would have done better to go down the Apple or Google path, but for Microsoft, the whole point was to get Microsoft hardware out.
FrostyPolicy@suppo.fi 1 month ago
They were already losing before MS bought them.
AbidanYre@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Elop came from MS and always seemed like he was there to sabotage Nokia
tal@lemmy.today 1 month ago
Microsoft’s interest in Nokia was being able to compete with what is now a dupopoly between Google and Apple in phones. They wanted to own a mobile platform. I am very confident that they did not want their project to flop. That being said, they’ll have had their own concerns and interests. Maybe Nokia would have done better to go down the Apple or Google path, but for Microsoft, the whole point was to get Microsoft hardware out.
bufalo1973@piefed.social 1 month ago
Microsoft wanted a platform... for Windows CE, not Nokia's MeeGo or Symbian. That was the problem. Elop destroyed Nokia to get the only the name.
AbidanYre@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Maybe sabotage isn’t the right word, but his decisions seemed to be more for Microsoft’s benefit than for Nokia’s.