I highly doubt AOSP can’t mantain itself, and that manufacturers could build from it and do whatever.
Comment on Google gets to keep Chrome, judge rules in search antitrust case
limerod@reddthat.com 4 days agoYou think other companies would provide sideloading like samsung, and oneplus? They would lock the OS hard and make it difficult to even unlock. Making android more closed than before.
Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 days ago
lordbritishbusiness@lemmy.world 4 days ago
It’d probably take some sort of Linux Foundation style arrangement with manufacturers supporting a neutral team built from Google’s Android division.
Ghoelian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 days ago
Well then why aren’t they doing so now? They’re already maintaining their own forks of android, should be pretty trivial to do.
limerod@reddthat.com 4 days ago
They need to maintain compatibility with play services to access apps on play store.
Also, starting with OnUI 8 and oxygenOS 16 bootloader unlocking is no longer supported. So, its a moot point. The hardening has already started.
WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 4 days ago
allowing 3rd party app installs is not required for play services
limerod@reddthat.com 3 days ago
I never said it was. Not sure what you mean.