If someone needs to be told that because it isn't self evident to them then they aren't going to respond to someone simply telling them.
Comment on Children as young as 11 tempted to try betting after being ‘flooded’ by celebrity endorsement
ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 3 days agoBut if someone doesn’t tell you it’s morally wrong to take advantage of fools/disturbed individuals that might be putting their whole life savings on red or black (and that you should only reap where you sow and not be greedy in general) and endangering not only themselves but also their families, how are we truly gonna convince someone in a to restrain themselves, specially if they’re in a position of comparative power?
Flamekebab@piefed.social 2 days ago
LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 days ago
Morally wrong yes, sinful no.
Frankly if someone used a religious framework to justify why something is good/bad it’s safe to say a lot of people will take away from it the exact opposite.
Flax_vert@feddit.uk 2 days ago
How do you have something being morally wrong without a religious framework
Flamekebab@piefed.social 2 days ago
Are you suggesting that all atheists are immoral?
Flax_vert@feddit.uk 2 days ago
If atheism is true, morality doesn’t exist. Most Atheists still feel some sense of mortality because we do have a knowledge of objective right and wrong. Although one can be misled into thinking some right things are wrong and some wrong things are right, without an infallible moral framework to turn to.
ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 2 days ago
I think sinfulness and immorality are usually one and the same but perhaps you’re right and I’m overreaching. I’m happy with calling it morally wrong. 👍
LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 days ago
No def not, most people I know and myself would be killed under any religious moral system because their entire existence is sin because that’s what’s written, but they’re some of the kindest, most humanist and sane people I’ve met, they just aren’t religious. Often they have individual moral frameworks that are some variation of the marxism-adjacent maximization of happiness/minimization of suffering or nietzchean fulfillment of potential.
I also have no problem calling it sinful either if it’s a useful shorthand tbf, it’s just words after all.
ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Any religious moral system that says God allows and wants you to murder kind, sane and humane folks can be safely disregarded. What the fuck, lol. Nobody who fears God’s judgment (which is a basic prerequisite to call yourself a monotheist!) can argue for that or act that way; how would you explain that shit to Him? But, you know, people… I mean, the Crusades were framed through “Deus Vult” (and the Zionist neo-Crusades are more or less excused the same way, right?), some things don’t change and all of those bloodthirsty murderers are burning in Hell, I’m pretty sure. 😔
Flax_vert@feddit.uk 2 days ago
The punishment for sin is death. All have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God. It’s mercy that God’s let you live this long. How shall you escape?
Flamekebab@piefed.social 2 days ago
Sin is a religious construct, not an ethical one. One religion considers something a sin, another considers it a sacrament. Unless one is forcing compliance with a single specific religion at a state level it's not particularly useful.
I'd argue that morality is also a construct but the distinguishing factor is that it is not tied to a specific religion and all the baggage associated with it (such as religion as identity, in-groups, that sort of thing).
Flax_vert@feddit.uk 2 days ago
That’s why there’s only one true religion.
ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Morality is (largely?) innate, and if I lined up 100 people and we really went full Socratic method we’d understand it, with only a few ridiculously disturbed and confused people arguing against whatever we acknowledged. It’s just complex, because some things are very case-to-case and people just want moral rulings under 10 words because complexity is scary and they lack discernment (the Germanic “a rule is a rule is a rule and I follow it because I’m a good boy” attitude comes to mind, for instance, which can easily end up in “I was just following orders!”), but the vast majority of people are reasonable enough we’d come to an understanding easily… in the vacuum of propaganda and brainwashing, ofc.