Comment on [deleted]
HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 1 day ago
Not visible in the dark?
That is in part why cyclist legally needs lights in the dark. If you cannot see what’s in front of you. Slow down. It may be a pedestrian and or a disabled person.
This is defiantly inconvenient. And a big oops.
But the idea it is dangerouse due to dark. Is a compleate failure by some cyclists to recognise their own responsibility.
theskyisfalling@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
90% of other cyclists I see on the road cycle with no lights and wearing dark colours with nothing reflective. It is dangerous enough as it is sharing the road with idiots in cars I can never understand why people make it even more dangerous for themselves willingly.
HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 1 day ago
As an old fart. Bike Lighting in the 80s. Not seeing well may be understandable, but most were more then able to avoid what at the time were rarer parked cars. Excessive shopping carts dumped along cycle tracks etc etc.
Given how insanely good available bike lights are now. Not to mention cheap to buy and power. Compared to the tungston bulbs and D-cell batts of then. There really is no excuse. For poor lighting.
We never really had reflective clothing then. But police would pull you over for no lights. Travelling any distance at night without lights was really not an option. At least in a urban area.