Again, it’s not the companies complying with the takedowns we are complaining about. It’s the companies that automatically send takedowns, with no regard for whether the takedowns are legitimate. These companies are supposed to have a duty to verify their copyright claim is valid before sending a takedown, but no one is enforcing it, so they don’t do it. That is the biggest issue here. Punish companies for sending illegitimate takedown requests.
Its about sending the takedown request in the first place, not the company complying with it. Its an entirely, automated process with no regard to validity
Ulrich@feddit.org 3 weeks ago
The reactions are legal compliance
DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Yes. So? How is that relevant, if we are talking about the automated requests destroying the internet?
Ulrich@feddit.org 3 weeks ago
Because the companies have no say in the matter.
DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Again, it’s not the companies complying with the takedowns we are complaining about. It’s the companies that automatically send takedowns, with no regard for whether the takedowns are legitimate. These companies are supposed to have a duty to verify their copyright claim is valid before sending a takedown, but no one is enforcing it, so they don’t do it. That is the biggest issue here. Punish companies for sending illegitimate takedown requests.
MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 3 weeks ago
Its about sending the takedown request in the first place, not the company complying with it. Its an entirely, automated process with no regard to validity
phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
They’re not exercising due diligence in confirming that the takedown requests are legitimate (for example, by actually asking the content owners).
Ulrich@feddit.org 2 weeks ago
Over again, yes, that’s legal compliance. That’s what the law demands.