The article is honestly really interesting for the details it gives. It's easy enough to dismiss anything as clickbait, but sometimes it just sounds like that old tired "Trump Derangement Syndrome" BS.
The article is honestly really interesting for the details it gives. It's easy enough to dismiss anything as clickbait, but sometimes it just sounds like that old tired "Trump Derangement Syndrome" BS.
sab@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Don’t get me wrong, I don’t think it’s clickbait, but personally I’m not that interested in a retelling of how he started gutting twitter shortly after he bought it last year. Maybe it’s not this article per se, just the straw of musk spam that broke the camels back.
stopthatgirl7@kbin.social 1 year ago
And you brought me into this why? You decided to insult me why, exactly?
ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 1 year ago
“Don’t get me wrong”
Then say different words that mean different things…
pivot_root@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Your words, my emphasis.
sab@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Thanks for emphasising I never called the article clickbait, just outrage-bait, circlejerk and low effort.
pivot_root@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Outrage-bait is clickbait. More specifically, it’s a subset of clickbait.
Wikipedia: