LOL if 4gb of memory is pretty minimal I am curious to know that they think to be resource intensive.
The maximum memory I am willing to allocate to a lxc container dedicated to bookmark management is 256mb
Comment on Does anybody else feel like Linkwarden is very resource intensive.
napkin2020@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Linkwarden has pretty minimal hardware requirements - it was tested on a VPS with 4gb of memory and it ran pretty smoothly, the most intense part is when you build the app, but once it’s running it’s relatively lightweight.
From their website. I wouldn’t consider tested on 4gb vps having minimal hardware.
I use Linkding and I am very happy with it. Less feature? Maybe. But it’s a bookmark sync. What do you need?
Moonrise2473@feddit.it 3 weeks ago
MotoAsh@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
4gb isn’t so bad for a build, but etf does it need to run smoothly?!
Wistful@discuss.tchncs.de 3 weeks ago
I use Linkding too, it’s very light and it’s great, I only wish it had the exclude tag filter and no tag filter. That would make it perfect.
alphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
A bookmark sync. Thanks. I’ll check it out.
AbidanYre@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
If you just want to sync bookmarks I don’t think linkwarden is what you want. Maybe floccus? I’m going to check out linkding that someone else mentioned because using git to sync floccus is broken on mobile platforms.