Comment on Does anybody else feel like Linkwarden is very resource intensive.

• Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  Er, phones have had 4gb for years.

  2gb for a system… My 2012 laptop has 4gb.

  source

  • alphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    Can’t really apply that logic to cheap vps

    source

    • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      Sure I can.

      You’re complaining about needing 4gb of RAM on a virtualized platform in 2025, when 4gb of ram was common on a laptop (which is heavily space constrained) thirteen years ago.

      It’s a fair comparison.

      source

      • tofu@lemmy.nocturnal.garden ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

        Laptops usually run desktop environments which are quite resources intensive. You can easily run some Docker services on 2GB. The debian VM that natively runs my nginx reverse proxy has 512 MB RAM and works perfectly fine.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • douglasg14b@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    There’s a big difference between desktop environment needs and headless server needs.

    Anything with user interaction will require an enormous number of additional services, which consumes resources.

    I expect to run simple headless software on 256-512 MB of RAM. For example.

    source
  • MangoPenguin@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    OP is using a VPS, not a phone/laptop.

    source

    • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      And?

      VPS it’s trivial to have the ram you need. My laptop had 2 memory slots. A VPS has how many? Oh, yea, it’s virtualized. 🤦🏼

      source

      • Azzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨6⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        You really don’t get having to pay for things, do you?

        source
  • Schlemmy@lemmy.ml ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    When running containers it’s not uncommon to relocate just 512 mb for lighter processes.

    source