Comment on Does anybody else feel like Linkwarden is very resource intensive.

AtariDump@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

• alphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  2 Gb ram and 2 CPU cores… I know it ain’t much, but I was not expecting a minimum requirement of 4 gb

  source

  • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    Er, phones have had 4gb for years.

    2gb for a system… My 2012 laptop has 4gb.

    source

    • alphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      Can’t really apply that logic to cheap vps

      source

      • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

        Sure I can.

        You’re complaining about needing 4gb of RAM on a virtualized platform in 2025, when 4gb of ram was common on a laptop (which is heavily space constrained) thirteen years ago.

        It’s a fair comparison.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      There’s a big difference between desktop environment needs and headless server needs.

      Anything with user interaction will require an enormous number of additional services, which consumes resources.

      I expect to run simple headless software on 256-512 MB of RAM. For example.

      source
    • MangoPenguin@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      OP is using a VPS, not a phone/laptop.

      source

      • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

        And?

        VPS it’s trivial to have the ram you need. My laptop had 2 memory slots. A VPS has how many? Oh, yea, it’s virtualized. 🤦🏼

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • Schlemmy@lemmy.ml ⁨6⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      When running containers it’s not uncommon to relocate just 512 mb for lighter processes.

      source