Comment on nooo my genderinos
jsomae@lemmy.ml 6 days agoI don’t entirely agree, because gender identity is known to be at least partially biological, e.g. there are correlations between transgenderism, skin elasticity, and hyper-flexibility.
Comment on nooo my genderinos
jsomae@lemmy.ml 6 days agoI don’t entirely agree, because gender identity is known to be at least partially biological, e.g. there are correlations between transgenderism, skin elasticity, and hyper-flexibility.
dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 days ago
just FYI, “transgenderism” is a word to avoid
and yes, gender identity seems to be biological, and genetic.
jsomae@lemmy.ml 5 days ago
my bad, updated to “transgender,” I read online that’s the preferred noun form (though it looks more adjectival to me)
dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 days ago
I think clinically the term gender dysphoria is used, but the trans community would probably prefer trans be used as an adjective and not a noun, someone is transgender, but not “a transgender”, if that makes sense.
also, the twin studies show gender identity is genetic and heritable:
…m.wikipedia.org/…/Causes_of_gender_incongruence
jsomae@lemmy.ml 5 days ago
gender dysphoria is not what I’m talking about, since not all transgender people have dysphoria.
To be clear – “transgender” the noun is not referring to a person (“that person is a transgender”* – proscribed) but rather as a substitute for “transgenderism”* (proscribed). Personally, using “transgender” seems linguistically strange to me and it just reminds me of Trump saying “transgender for everybody” but if it’s what people prefer then who am I to judge.
Anyway – yes, I agree that it seems very probable that there are strong genetic components to transgender, but it’s also clearly not purely genetic.