It isn’t enough for htem to make a ‘child friendly’ space. Because it isn’t about being child friendly. They must impose themselves on EVERYBODY so they can look and go ‘I MADE EVERYONE CONFIRM.’
knobbysideup@sh.itjust.works 6 days ago
Make a .kids tld. Require certification to host on it. Let parents and schools filter to only that domain if they like.
Leave everybody else the fuck alone.
Tired of the stupidity that is congress, both state and federal.
singletona@lemmy.world 5 days ago
BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 5 days ago
Making TLDs for restricted content (.adu or .xxx) would be a super easy way to filter sites as well. To me it’s like putting Playboys or whatever at the top of the rack with an opaque plastic – nothing is physically stopping kids from getting to it except gross negligence from every adult in the vicinity.
knobbysideup@sh.itjust.works 5 days ago
No, that’s backwards. You want to whitelist, deny by default, not whack a mole a blacklist. Then you set it once and done. Hence the certification requirement to be on the whitelist.
P1nkman@lemmy.world 5 days ago
Go to touch.kids for all your tTouchy needs!
Direct login to your office: touch.my.kids
cm0002@piefed.world 5 days ago
Not a bad idea, or a mass register of all certified kid friendly domains regardless of TLD that such filtering software can freely pull from
Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 6 days ago
Once upon a time there was .edu
But such limitations usually have failed.