I’ll take the low hanging fruit and discuss whether this is in line with the community rules:

You are violating rules 1, 2, 5 and arguably 10.

1 & 2 need to no further argument; they are syntactical in nature.

Rule 5: Is about not posting something to further an agenda or spurr debates. Your post is more argument than fact and description. I think that’s pretty self-explanatory.

Rule 10: the fact outlined is not true, and we don’t need to have a religious discussion about that; we can merely look at this in isolation. Whether Jesus is real or not can’t be proven because we project something personally onto him. If you believe in Jesus, that’s fine, but this hasn’t passed the scientific threshold of being a fact.