Comment on GitHub is no longer independent at Microsoft after CEO resignation
SexualPolytope@lemmy.sdf.org 2 months ago
I’m just waiting for Forgejo federation to be a thing, and some sort of definitive website for discovering projects. Right now, even though I do have my slefhosted forgejo instance, I still need to keep my code on GitHub, or no-one else will ever find it.
sommerset@thelemmy.club 2 months ago
I’m using gitea - why u guys use forgejo again?
dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
I just half went down this rabbit hole, I’m thinking forgejo is the best option (for me) because:
Forgejo explaining the differences: forgejo.org/compare-to-gitea/
sommerset@thelemmy.club 2 months ago
Gitea doesn’t use GitHub action. Syntax is compatible yes, but it’s not GitHub actions
emzili@programming.dev 2 months ago
That’s not what they mean, if you go to Gitea’s website and follow the links to the source code, you’ll find its being hosted on GitHub. Contrast this with Forgejo which is being hosted at Codeberg, a public Forgejo instance.
pupbiru@aussie.zone 2 months ago
github.com/go-gitea/gitea/tree/main/…/workflows
github.com/go-gitea/gitea/actions
they do in fact make extensive use of github actions
snusnu@lemmynsfw.com 2 months ago
I don’t remember the details, but something happened to the Gitea ownership structure without warning, and people were upset about it.
As an actual differentiator: Forgejo has an LTS version that which gets support for 1 year. Normal versions only get supported until the next major release (every few months).
endoflife.date/forgejo
Gitea to my knowledge doesn’t have any LTS.
SexualPolytope@lemmy.sdf.org 2 months ago
All the reasons that others mentioned, plus it sound cool.