No one compares to Starlink unfortunately. It’s really that much better. Source: FiL has been on the beta since the first constellation went up.
The other satellite players (Hughesnet, Viasat), the fixed 5G boxes (although places sufficiently rural to seriously consider dialup may not have 5G), probably some smaller boutique dialup ISPs.
QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
I read months ago that Amazon was stepping into the game but I haven’t heard anything since then.
frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
What we really need to compete against Starlink’s network full of small satellites threatening a Kessler syndrome incident is a second network full of small satellites threatening s Kessler syndrome incident. And a third and a fourth.
Or put fiber everywhere.
HBK@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
Starlink satellites are in low Earth orbit. They could still cause Kessler syndrome, but aren’t as much of a concern as higher orbits.
Here are some quotes regarding this from and Aerospace America article
frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 hours ago
That’s just “the worst possible consequences won’t happen”. The danger at higher orbits is that things wouldn’t come down, and we couldn’t safely launch rockets past that orbit. That wouldn’t happen here, but destroying everything in LEO would still be pretty bad. Astronauts would likely die.