Comment on How Wikipedia is fighting AI slop content

vivalapivo@lemmy.today ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

• chaosCruiser@futurology.today ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  A little while ago there was a similar article about the same thing. The answer was: deleting stuff.

  If an article matches certain criteria, it just gets deleted without any discussion. Normally, there would be a lengthy discussion phase, which works reasonably well as long as actual humans are the ones writing the articles. Now that LLMs are generating trash, you need to lower the threshold for deletion in order to keep up with the rapid pace.

  source

  • tarknassus@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    Didn’t they introduce a new rapid deletion process? IIRC it’s a seven-day proposal and discussion before deletion. For suspected AI it’s basically a one day thing.

    source
  • crandlecan@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    Thanks! Also: archive.is/MmlXG

    source
• PagPag@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  This place needs a bot that automatically archives every link posted because most people are still painfully unaware of these tools:

  archive.is/MmlXG

  • archive.ph

  • archive.is

  • ghostarchive.org

  source
• crandlecan@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  You sure? Worked for me.

  source

  • crandlecan@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    archive.is/MmlXG

    source