Comment on My latest hyperfixation

Armand1@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

• BehindTheBarrier@programming.dev ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I’m no expert on the grain side, but Netflix had a nice writeup about its power.

  netflixtechblog.com/av1-scale-film-grain-synthesi…

  I also heard that when you use film grain, but disable the denoising done on the output to properly preserve detail in the encoding. Which depends on the encoder, but should generally be possible on the ones that do film grain.

  But it might not be as good for artistic film grain that doesn’t fit normal “grain” in videos.

  source
• Pyroglyph@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I could be wrong, but isn’t the idea that it removes the film grain to aid compressing the ““actual”” image behind the grain, and then the player adds the grain back in during playback?

  The way you say it makes it sound like you want to compress the grain itself, and that sounds to me like a “I like the vinyl crackle in my digital media” take. Not that that’s a bad thing, everyone has preferences, but it’s also unlikely that AV1 (or any codec for that matter) was designed with the preservation of accurate film grain in mind.

  source

  • Armand1@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    That’s more or less what I’m saying yes, I do like the original film grain look of movies, and often attempts to remove it removed detail, making things look smudgy.

    As for if no codec is designed for this, Blu-Rays preserve film grain, often very well, and they use x265. Granted they do this partially by brute force by having a bit rate of 30mbps+, but I’ve found that you can quite easily reduce that but rate to 12mbps and still preserve most film grain reasonably well. Especially if you use h265, the CPU version (NVENC is nowhere near as good with grain).

    source