Comment on The 2025 version of "Please consider this environment before printing this email" should be "Please consider this environment before using A.I. to respond to this email"

<- View Parent
inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

So this is kind of an apples and oranges thing, I on my phone so I can’t fully convert the numbers, but I took a few minutes to poke around and I think I found some stats that should put this in perspective.

www.arbor.eco/blog/ai-environmental-impact

Each query sends out roughly 4.32 grams of CO₂e (MLCO2), which may seem trivial on its own but adds up millions of queries a day, and you’re looking at a staggering daily output. 1 million messages sent to ChatGPT is equivalent to 11,001 miles driven by an average gasoline-powered passenger vehicle

Which is yikes and without a doubt unsustainable energy usage, but comparing this to wikis article on COVID environmental impacts

en.wikipedia.org/…/Impact_of_the_COVID-19_pandemi…

In 2020, carbon dioxide emissions fell by 6.4% or 2.3 billion tonnes globally.

My napkin math says that we would need ~532,407,407 AI queries to match the 2020 work for home drop, but unfortunately, Chat GPT alone is estimating 2.5 billion prompts, daily.

I started writing this assuming the opposite was true but unfortunately AI is a bigger environmental impact than an RTO. Which is honestly shocking. I hope someone corrects my math and tells me it isn’t this dire. Work from should be the norm, but AI is truly just a massive environmental burden.

source
Sort:hotnewtop