al jazeera is a wholy qatari owned propoganda mouthpiece for ismalic jihadis
Comment on Meta deletes Al Jazeera presenter’s profile after show criticising Israel
nyctre@lemmy.world 1 year agoWhy is that good?
downpunxx@kbin.social 1 year ago
FrankTheHealer@lemmy.world 1 year ago
While that is true, silencing journalists sets a very bad precedent
downpunxx@kbin.social 1 year ago
I'd want Der Sturmer and the KKK weekly to be deplatformed too, it is not journalism, it's racist propaganda, Al Jazeera is a Qatari owned mouthpiece for Islamic Jihadis
CatWhoMustNotBeNamed@geddit.social 1 year ago
Let the removeds bring their ideas into the light, so we know who they are and what they think.
Suppression is just a bad idea, and your naivete is terrifying.
jet@hackertalks.com 1 year ago
The problem with deplatforming people is eventually your group is going to be the out group, and it’s going to get deplatformed. Either we have freedom of expression for everybody or for nobody.
Petter1@lemm.ee 1 year ago
If we deplatform whole communities, they will meet in the dark and we have no way to see who is a shady mf
hark@lemmy.world 1 year ago
If that’s such a problem, why’d they wait until this particular piece to deplatform and even then only the presenter’s profile?
CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
He is a Nazi.
shadysus@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
… what?
Al Jazeera is Qatari, and so I don’t go to them for content about Qatar in case there’s a bias. However it’s a pretty large organization and they do decent investigative work on stuff happening in South America, Africa, & Asia. New organizations pick topics they think the readers want to see, and so in Canada (and likely the US) there’s often little to no coverage on stuff in these parts of the world. Al Jazeera puts out decent investigative pieces and documentaries about these places.
TLDR: Al Jazeera isn’t unbiased, and I avoid them on certain topics. However I DO go to them for other stuff.
This article specifically sounds like a bad thing: