Comment on Florida sues some of the biggest porn platforms, accusing them of not complying with the state's age verification law

• HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Sir, they do offer therapy for people with issues like yours.

  source

  • Jaded99@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    [deleted]

    source

    • HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨23⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Well yea, unlike you I actually got help.

      source
• JustARaccoon@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Bang on, damn, you got me so good.

  Is this really how you carry your arguments? Demeaning and projecting over your opponent? I guess you’re safe from all that insane porn now since you’re failing the ID check for being underage.

  source

  • Jaded99@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    [deleted]

    source

    • JustARaccoon@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      Cool man, fyi generally you want to avoid projecting assumptions on people and listen instead to their actual point. You’re not arguing with caricatures, you’re arguing with other people who might know as much or more than you do, so the preachy tone isn’t doing you any favours in trying to convince people.

      A big argument against this type of blocking is giving up private information to private entities to access content that can be tracked back to them is a huge risk for privacy, it doesn’t matter if it’s porn or something else, you can see it in the UK too where speech about Palestine is being blocked by the same ruling that is “protecting children”. Someone else here also raised a good point, why is it on these websites to implement age verification and not on the state, when many of those websites aren’t hosted in Florida?

      But no you’re not interested in a good debate, you just see a political choice that aligns with your views and anyone who has issues with the implementation, consequences, or any other issue (including a porn ban in general) is treated like the worst of the worst. “Surely this is a morally good thing, so all who oppose must be morally abhorrent”, except this is exactly why the lawmakers prey on when they implement surveillance type shit all in the name of “protecting the children”, they make it so arguing against it is seen as protecting abusers when the same resolution could be reached in a way that doesn’t infringe on people’s privacy.

      source

      • Jaded99@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

        [deleted]

        source

        • -> View More Comments