Comment on Tesla loses Autopilot wrongful death case in $329 million verdict
Auli@lemmy.ca 3 weeks agoFuck that I’m not a beta tester for a company. What happened to having a good product and then releasing it. Not oh let’s see what happens.
Comment on Tesla loses Autopilot wrongful death case in $329 million verdict
Auli@lemmy.ca 3 weeks agoFuck that I’m not a beta tester for a company. What happened to having a good product and then releasing it. Not oh let’s see what happens.
CannedYeet@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
It’s not that simple. Imagine you’re dieing of a rare terminal disease. A pharma company is developing a new drug for it. Obviously you want it. But they tell you you can’t have it because “we’re not releasing it until we know it’s good”.
Mirshe@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
This is, or was (thanks RFK for handing the industry a blank check), how pharma development works. You don’t even get to do human trials until you’re pretty damn sure it’s not going to kill anyone. “Experimental medicine” stuff you read about is still medicine that’s been in development for YEARS, and gone through animal, cellular, and various other trials.
CannedYeet@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Actually we have “right to try” laws for the scenario I described.
But the FDA could use some serious reform. Under the system we have, an FDA approval lumps together the determinations of whether a drugs is safe, effective and worth paying for. A more libertarian system would let people spend their own money on drugs that are safe even if the FDA’s particular research didn’t find them effective. And it wouldn’t waste tax payer money on drugs that are effective but exorbitantly expensive relative to their minimal effectiveness. But if a wealthy person wants to spend their own money, thereby subsidizing pharmaceuticals for the rest of us, that’s great in my opinion.