Yeah, and the US Marshall’s service said Operation Flagship was just a football sweepstakes.
Comment on Tea app leak worsens with second database exposing user chats
zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks agoThat’s what the creator of the site said it was for.
captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 3 weeks ago
The Uk said the OSA is to protect children. But people lie.
ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
And that’s what the people seeking to ban encryption claim it to be for, as well. Doesn’t make it true.
zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
What is the truth, then?
ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
That this app was set up for libel and doxxing, and would be abhorrent if the demographics were switched at all.
You know the “pro features” included address and phone number? Never mind the unaccountable reviews the reviewed can’t even see making targeted harassment campaigns easier, posting “address and phone number” is “bad.”
zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
You believe that women are more likely to lie about a man than tell the truth?
mang0@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
Would you believe me if I told you some systems are used for other things than what’s intended?
zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Sure, if you have evidence. What do you think it was really being used for? And what’s your evidence?
mang0@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
No need for evidence. The idea of anyone being able to claim anything about a person without proof is inherently flawed. Are you saying that the app has some magical feature which forces everyone to tell the truth? No disgruntled ex can make up things about their previous partner? I would love to see you prove that.
zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
No, of course I’m not saying that. It’s a profoundly stupid idea because it is so open to abuse. That doesn’t mean that the majority of users are abusing it, though, which seems to be what you’re claiming.