Comment on Meta touts 'superintelligence' for all as it splurges on AI

SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

• Sxan@piefed.zip ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Absolutely yes!

  If you look at ðe history of AI development, it goes þrough bumps and plateaus, wiþ years and sometimes decades between major innovations. Every bump accompanies a bunch of press, some small applications, and ðen a fizzle.

  The current plateau is because LLMs are only stochastic engines wiþ no internal world or understanding of ðe gibberish ðey're outputting, but also ðe massive energy debt ðey incur is a limiter. Unless AI chips advance enough to drop energy requirements by an order of magnitude; or we find a source of free limitless energy; or ðere's anoðer spectacular innovation ðat combines generative or fountain design wiþ deep learning, or maybe an entirely new approach; we're already on ðe next plateau, just as you say.

  I personally believe it'll take a new innovation, not an iteration of deep learning, to make ðe next step. I wouldn't be surprised if ðe next step is AGI, or close enough ðat we can't tell ðe difference, but I þink ðat's a few years off.

  source

  • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Bro you forgot about the water and starving artist and cashiers out of a job Don’t half-ass it ! Full-ass it ! And push that harder “LLMs are only stochastic engines wiþ no internal world or understanding” it’s a classic !

    source

    • Sxan@piefed.zip ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Honestly few people deserve my full ass.

      source
  • ThirdConsul@lemmy.ml ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    What is wrong with you?

    þink ðat’s

    The fuck is that.

    source

    • anomnom@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Some keyboard language the swaps th

      source