Like axing a show that didn’t make money ?
That a poor comparison since on x the moderations is about random citizen and not paid employee doing a work for a company that a the end of the day is free to choose how to spent her money
Comment on US condemns French inquiry into Elon Musk's social media platform X/Twitter.
breecher@sh.itjust.works 1 day agoThere are many ways to suppress speech.
bigmamoth@lemmy.world 21 hours ago
MellowYellow13@lemmy.world 19 hours ago
It did make loads of money though? Why do you get to just push blatant lies?
smeenz@lemmy.nz 49 minutes ago
For the same freedom of speech reasons that we’re applying to Colbert. That jerkwad is just as entitled to lie as they are to tell the truth, and it’s up to everyone else to call them out on it.
db2@lemmy.world 21 hours ago
Like axing a show that didn’t make money ?
Even if that were true, which it isn’t, what business does the president have even mentioning it much less making a demand?
MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 21 hours ago
“Free speech” doesn’t entitle you to dictate policy over privately held companies. We spent four years trying to convince Trumpers of this. Be smarter.
fishy@lemmy.today 20 hours ago
What do you mean, did the Biden admin target any particular shows or networks? Are you also aware the current admin is holding off Paramount’s merger to exert influence over their programming? IDK how free that feels. May not be directly breaking laws, but it’s absolutely a subversion of free speech.
MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 19 hours ago
No, it’s not. Free speech protects what you say from the government, not your employer. Your employer ALSO has free speech, meaning they can decide what can and can’t be said on their property.
This is like saying Sesame Street doesn’t show hardcore porn and that’s a violation of free speech.
fishy@lemmy.today 18 hours ago
Based on your response, I’m not sure you even read my questions.