A tolerant society can not tolerate intolerance. One side will attempt to “just live”, but the intolerant side is incapable of “letting live”, and they will not stop until they replace tolerance with their system of hate.
Or just live and let live…
freddydunningkruger@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Honytawk@feddit.nl 1 day ago
Why should we? They don’t let us live.
MrNobody@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
Sure, but since orgaanised religions can’t help to force others to live by their standards, they need to get out of the way. I’m fine with people needing a comfort measure, even if its in the form of an invisibile friend. Whatever helps people sleep at night. However, when they try to force their ideals down everybody elses throat thats a big no.
So, since they can’t ‘live and let live’ they need to go the way of the dodo, fuck off, and leave the rest of society alone.
Gsus4@mander.xyz 1 day ago
Meh, I consider religions as political movements. When they go crazy fundamentalist, sure, shut them down.
Barrymore@sh.itjust.works 15 hours ago
But what undeniable good thing comes from religion? It’s not just that they have the potential for destruction and hate, it’s that those are the only possible outcomes
Gsus4@mander.xyz 14 hours ago
What undeniable good thing comes from politics?
drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 21 hours ago
if that was an option we would not have to have this discussion.
TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Live and let live is pretty much the antithesis of organised religion
Jarix@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
And trickle down some economy while we are at it
JigglySackles@lemmy.world 18 hours ago
We’ve tried that one.