Wrong bogeyman here, the more worrying problem is the CEO endorsing the US republicans, seemingly (and charitably) due to the ostensibly pro-privacy policy position, ignoring all the other policy advocation attached to endorsing them or their track record of doublespeak particularly around things like privacy.
Comment on Proton freezes Swiss investment over surveillance fears
lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Yeah Russia’s the only one who gets Proton data
9point6@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Vinstaal0@feddit.nl 1 month ago
Proton is owned by an actual non-profit (not one of those fake once you have in the US) and Andy is only 1/3rd of it so he cannot really do much alone, plus he still needs to follow the objective for the non-profit otherwise he can be held personally responsible.
Personally, I live in a country where you can vote for hundreds of politicians, and we have multiple parties ruling the country and I don’t believe that agreeing with one statement is enduring anybody.
Still, Andy Yen is an idiot and Proton needs some extra governance structure to keep him in check (firing him is going to be a hard one since he still owns shares IIRC). Believe what you want and choose to use Proton or not, but it doesn’t help the cause for the people to be more critical without giving context.
This was said by Andy directly: miro.medium.com/…/1*9_3JV1BBIZjAYkoTDQzOlg.png This was said by Andy through Proton: archive.ph/quYyb And this was his later comment from his own account: miro.medium.com/…/1*Pz-ct2LGRpxWdKsHSZu1Rg.png
homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Yeah I’m not buying any excuses. One supports trump, one gets the fuck out.
ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 1 month ago
That was a verrry disappointing and tone deaf comment from him, yeah. He could have said that neither party is committed to Proton’s values and been done with it, instead he kissed the ring.
lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 1 month ago
That’s what I said - Russia, GOP… no difference
hanke@feddit.nu 1 month ago
Would you mind elaborating?
RedPandaRaider@feddit.org 1 month ago
No so does France. Proton helped convict a French environmental activist by providing the courts full access to their private proton account.
Vinstaal0@feddit.nl 1 month ago
Proton nor Tuta nor anybody else is above the law, you can read independant reports on the matter scroll.in/…/why-a-court-ban-on-encrypted-email-se… or Proton’s own post about it proton.me/blog/climate-activist-arrest
But I don’t believe that their entire account was shared with the police, but if that actually did happen and you have a proper source for it I gotta think to move my mail after all, so could you please share with the class where you read this?
philpo@feddit.org 1 month ago
Tbh, it’s not the worst thing when a service does that. There are cases where it is indicated - cartels, CSAM, etc. do not deserve a safe haven. The bad part about the France issue is the fact that the Swiss court system willfully allowed a case that was not per se illegal in Switzerland and had rather controversial legal grounds in France to proceed. This is very similar to the cases where Switzerland simply ignored their own laws under pressure from the US government in terms of bank accounts 15 years earlier.
This is rather concerning and many Swiss legal experts did not share the opinion of Proton that there was nothing Proton could have done.
Vinstaal0@feddit.nl 1 month ago
Maybe Proton could have done more, but maybe not on the other hand the ISP is also wrong for supplying the name that goes with the IP. (yes I know that’s deflection, but still).
I personally feel like we need to find a middle ground between personal privacy and being able to stop criminals/terrorists/fraud etc.
RedPandaRaider@feddit.org 1 month ago
It’s not about the law, but what’s right to me.
Proton according to this post is virtue signalling. Claiming one thing, then doing the other.
Vinstaal0@feddit.nl 1 month ago
It is about the law, though. Proton has always been clear about the possibility that they are required to hand over data if the Swiss government requires it: proton.me/legal/transparency
So IDK where you are getting that they are saying one thing and doing another thing and even more important where you got that they shared ENCRYPTED data. Cause if they have the ability to even do that I have to rethink my choose since that should be impossible if Proton did it correctly and are trustworthy.
Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
Gonna need something a little more solid that your feelsies.
independantiste@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
such a large statement with such little evidence
y0kai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
Sounds like something a RUSSIAN would say /s