If you’re doing this through Google or whichever company is facilitating, then I would say that’s the party doing all of the things listed
surveiled
surveillance implies active, constant, and surreptitious… i would not classify mutual location sharing as any of that: it’s passive, occasional, and well-known and consented to by both parties
_g_be@lemmy.world 1 day ago
supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 20 hours ago
NO surveillance is truly constant, that would defeat the point of surveillance which is to create the ever present possibility that someone is watching so you begin to subconciously assume you are always being watched.