Is that accurate though? Assume a satellite is in a decaying orbit (thus too low to contribute to Kessler syndrome on its own) and another satellite is in a different orbit eccentricity-wise but they both collide. Are we certain that none of the pieces from the collision would acquire enough speed to become boloids that contribute to Kessler syndrome?
Time to go down the rabbit hole that is orbital mechanics for me again. Byeeee lol
PraiseTheSoup@midwest.social 1 day ago
but they pollute the night sky visually and that’s nearly as bad.
Serinus@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I mean… it’s not. One problem solves itself over time if not touched, the other is permanent and prevents us from leaving the planet.
CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
The night sky is also polluted by your home’s lighting and car headlights but that doesn’t seem to be a problem for most people.
WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
yeah, you can’t turn off your home’s lighting, additionally everyone lives in citiee anyway, so it’s moot!
CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Okay, try turning your lights off tonight and report back with how many additional stars you can see.
Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 1 day ago
Everyone lives in cities?
Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I mean, no it’s not.
Kessler syndrome is about a chain reaction that destroys everything in orbit and keeps us from accessing space for years.
Ruining your view is not “nearly as bad”. That makes you sound like one of those folks on Martha’s Vineyard, opposing offshore wind turbines that local communities desperately need, because they’ll “ruin the view”.