The Epstein list isn’t the only evidence they would find.
Also, if women’s testimony isn’t good enough, why is a list written by a man good enough?
How does “We wouldn’t need [evidence] if society just trusted women” fit your argument?
The Epstein list isn’t the only evidence they would find.
Also, if women’s testimony isn’t good enough, why is a list written by a man good enough?
Evidence directly from the suspect(s) is basically a confession. Gender has nothing to do with it.
Then use that evidence.
That would require an investigation. Which never happened because nobody listened to the women who spoke up.
You think Epstein hasn’t been investigated?
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Being in the Epstein log books isn’t evidence of sexual assault comparable to simply listening to Virginia Giuffre.
And, ffs, Testimony Is Evidence. If a woman says “I’ve been raped, that’s the guy who did it”, that’s evidence of the accused committing a rape.
Bongles@lemmy.zip 8 months ago
UnderpantsWeevil raped me.
novibe@lemmy.ml 8 months ago
You do know what a testimony is right? 😂
Would you be willing to say that in court, under threat of perjury?
3abas@lemmy.world 8 months ago
If I knew you personally and I was in a desperate situation and thought I could extract life changing amounts from you, yes, I might be willing to say that in court, under threat of perjury.
You’re implying this doesn’t happen, which is clearly false. False accusations of rape have been made in court. At least OP is asking people to believe women without evidence, but you’re asking us to believe no one ever files frivolous lawsuits, contrary to much available evidence.
In fact, in a legal system like the US that often favors persecution over defense, once an accusation is made to a cop, it can take on momentum toward court.
Blindly believing accusers because they are women isn’t egalitarian, it’s sexist.
…wikipedia.org/…/Brian_Banks_(American_football)
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_lacrosse_rape_hoax
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Rape_on_Campus