Realistically, this just means draining the 1-2 people with empathy (Jane Goodall and… that’s probably it?) and spreading it across 8 billion people.
Comment on Everybody gets one [choose wisely]
CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 4 days ago
Could you spread all then empathy across everyone evenly, and then increase it by about 10%?
ivanafterall@lemmy.world 4 days ago
CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 2 days ago
So you don’t have any empathy?
ivanafterall@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Well, “basically just me and Jane Goodall” lands a little differently.
balderdash9@lemmy.zip 4 days ago
All the empathy in the world (+10%) is spread “evenly” to one person at a time, randomly, every minute of the day:
Image
CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 4 days ago
I said spread, not share. One would not consider peanut butter spread on bread if you put it in one glob and then picked up and moved the glob somewhere else.
balderdash9@lemmy.zip 3 days ago
“Spread” indeed implies but does not entail that it happens instantly. For instance, Bill Gates could say that he “spread riches among the poor” without mentioning that he did it slowly, over decades. There’s a grammatical ambiguity to be exploited.
CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 2 days ago
Not if he gave $1 million to one person, then took it away and have it to someone else.