Comment on Vibe coding takes the "science" out of computer science
spankmonkey@lemmy.world 2 days agoI’m experienced and can review the output for sanity and completion. I can test it, I can rewrite it, etc.
You aren’t vibe coding if you do it properly…
jwmgregory@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 days ago
why do you guys always just move the goalposts?
“X thing isn’t real AI, because real AI sucks and I might have to concede the positive attributes of X about AI generally… [OCR, chess bots, etc.]”
“Y thing isn’t real vibe coding, because real vibing coding sucks and I might have to concede the positive attributes of Y about vibe coding…”
like… you seem like you’ve just decided these things are “bad things” in your head and just shift your definitions the moment you meet reality and see anything that might evoke cognitive dissonance about it.
EnsignWashout@startrek.website 2 days ago
“Vibe coding” has a pretty specific definition, which includes not understanding the code. So writing tests, or correcting the code both disqualify a piece of work from being technically “vibe coded”.
spankmonkey@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Usage by scientists to do pattern matching and by language models to replicate natural sounding language and a bunch of other AI is neat and useful but not intelligent as described by people that are dumping LLMs into settings they are not actually useful for like regurgitating accurate facts.
When we criticize AI in situations like this it is because they are using a tape ruler to hammer in a nail and then taking away people’s hammers and replacing them with tape measures and then we find out they stole all the tape measures.
We are complaining about a combination of what it is and how it is used. We also want to make sure that a term that means something stupid is clearly used for that stupid thing and doesn’t lose meaning because they have some vaguely related usage. Using a hammer put pound in a nail and using the hammers claw to pull a nail out are two different things even if they both use a nail.
Where as you seem to think anyone criticizing shitty use of AI means all AI that exists instead of understanding context.