Here’s the blog post from Codeberg regarding their stance on AI/LLM usage:
blog.codeberg.org/protecting-our-floss-commons-fr…
And at the very bottom:
However, we also need to be honest about certain use cases that might no longer be welcome on Codeberg. If you see yourself on this list, you don’t need to move right away, but there might be other places that better fit your needs:
Projects that are created by LLM "agents" in autonomous ways Projects written and maintained with heavy use of LLMs Projects where the amount of resources (e.g. storage, CI/CD) is significantly larger than what the involved amount of people could have created by hand Projects heavily tied to the LLM ecosystem, e.g. LLM-written tools to ease LLM usage Users sending LLM contributions in violation of project's custom policies
LazyNVR was started without any AI assistance… Both use of ai and the rule came afterward.
spectrums_coherence@piefed.social 4 days ago
Also codeberg did not have a clear cut “no AI policy”, only when the AI use causes significant storage cost or abnormal development pattern.
For example, I think small AI experiment on mostly hand written codebase or AI validation of handwritten code are still allowed on codeberg.
Yes, my use case seems to be accepted indeed.
Blaze@piefed.zip 4 days ago
I hope so, because otherwise they are going to be empty quite soon.