Comment on Grandma is on her own
Dasus@lemmy.world 1 week agoI said that I’ve read credible similarly fucked up stories. I meant that I’ve read them over the years. You know that the US is fucked up and crazy shit happens there and I’ve just shown you a personal clip of a person saying that it’s a 100% true story what happened to them, then I’ve shown you how that is plausible through the legislation that the US has.
You’ve constantly been shown wrong, yet you won’t admit to a single mistake and you’re just shifting goalposts further and further and further.
If I said that because you’re a Finn, you’re wrong about filial responsibility, that’s an ad hominem.
Oh god, this is hilarious. Remember how I said that you keep proving yourself wrong? Self-humiliating? This is one those times. You literally implied this, very strongly, SEVERAL TIMES.
Honestly dude, I don’t give a shit what someone from Finland thinks about filial responsibility laws in the United States.
As in “your opinion on these facts doesn’t matter because of a personal property.”
That’s literally a textbook ad hominem. Once again, I prove you wrong, based on things you’ve said, yet you can’t accept it. You say in your last comment that “I don’t have arguments”, but you keep literally ignoring the ones I’m saying in each and every single comment:
Medical debt is dismissed in probate insolvency, except in rare cases.
Why are you talking about medical debt? We’ve already established that it’s an exception to this. We’re now pointing out that you argued that filial responsibility laws have “nothing” to do with inheriting debt, which is wrong, you then claimed that filial responsibility SOLELY concerns medical debt, which is also wrong. And you’re simply going to ignore having been wrong, because you’re not a big enough person to do that, just like I said from the very start.
Why is medical debt not dissolved in probate, despite insolvency? Because of filial laws Are you gonna ignore that?
Filial responsibility laws aren’t only for medical debts, you were wrong. Are you gonna ignore that?
And before all that, you were saying that “filial responsibility laws have NOTHING to do with debt”. Are you gonna ignore that?
You simply can’t argue, you don’t know the subject, and you should’ve taken the gracious option I offered earlier. ;)
deranger@sh.itjust.works 1 week ago
Medical debt is dissolved in probate, genius. Just not the kind related to say, nursing homes. That’s when filial responsibility comes into play. I’m not responsible for my parents medical debt; I am responsible for their care, in some backwards states, and medical debt can be a part of that, but not necessarily, as in the pacemaker example I used earlier.
There’s no ad hominem in my comments. Quote me. Implications are neither here nor there. Me saying your opinion doesn’t matter to me is not an ad hominem. I’m saying you’re wrong because the facts don’t support your points, not because of any personal characteristics you have.
Dasus@lemmy.world 1 week ago
UUUH, he’s *learned the words! Only after me repeating them a dozen fuckingtimes :D
Blablabla more excuses and more denial.
Why is medical debt not dissolved in probate, despite insolvency? Because of filial laws Are you gonna ignore that?
Filial responsibility laws aren’t only for medical debts, you were wrong. Are you gonna ignore that?
And before all that, you were saying that “filial responsibility laws have NOTHING to do with debt”. Are you gonna ignore that?
You simply can’t argue, you don’t know the subject, and you should’ve taken the gracious option I offered earlier. ;)
You’re simply not man enough to admit to when you’re wrong, and that’s why you’re never gonna learn, and why you’re gonna stay a small, insignificant ignorant arsehole who no-one will ever love.
I’m not contradicting anything. Do you not speak English. Medical debt is the established exception. I’m asking for you to say what the reason is for that exception. Which you simply aren’t abled enough to do.
Why is medical debt not dissolved in probate, despite insolvency? Because of filial laws Are you gonna ignore that?
Filial responsibility laws aren’t only for medical debts, you were wrong. Are you gonna ignore that?
And before all that, you were saying that “filial responsibility laws have NOTHING to do with debt”. Are you gonna ignore that?
You simply can’t argue, you don’t know the subject, and you should’ve taken the gracious option I offered earlier. ;)
Next I’ll stop replying to any of your personal bullshit, and just post facts about the thread and the convo we’ve had, the questions you’ve answered. Then you won’t be able to answer them and you’ll fuck off in a week or so, your tail between your legs. Like the thousand or so other pathetic cases I’ve seen before who can’t admit when they’ve wrong.
deranger@sh.itjust.works 1 week ago
Even after I pointed out you misquoted me here, you’re still doing it. You’re leaving out a key piece of the quote which is extremely relevant to your frankly ridiculous claim about being responsible for your parent’s child support debt, or other debts to the state.
Maybe spend less time formatting your text and more time actually reading.
Dasus@lemmy.world 5 days ago
I must have missed this comment, clicked read some night.
So now you’re pretending you haven’t said the moronic things that everyone can see you have? Just how deluded must you be to do that?
You said you hadn’t made ad hominems, after which I copied an exact ad hominem. You’re gonna ignore that, because you’re not man enough to admit to your mistakes.
You said VERBATIM; “Filial responsibility laws have nothing to do with debt to the state.”
You said filial responsibility laws SOLELY concern medical debt (and “solely” was your word choice).
See, that’s why my comment replies ago, being personal has nothing to do with an ad hominem. I can say "you’re wrong, because here’s how it actually goes, here’s actual sources for this claim, you barely literate shadow of a human being. But I said “you’re wrong BECAUSE you’re a barely literate shadow of a human being”, that would be an ad hominem.
You simply keep being 10000000000000% wrong, but you’re too small of a man to admit to a single mistake. And I’m gonna keep laughing at you for it until you have a tantrum worse than a six-year old, because again, everyone can see how wrong you are and now we’re just gonna expose your childlike ego in this thread. Like I said at the start, you should’ve taken the gracious option.
Now you’ll get schooled by me and humiliated by yourself. Although that’s happened like a dozen times already. I literally had to point out LITERALLY the first words in these articles which have sources, yet all you can come up with “nuh-uh, I’m american and you’re not so I know better because my arse is trusworthier than some credible sources so nothing moronic I said is actually moronic”.
I think you’re actually like 12 lol.