Comment on Exclusive: Evidence of cell phone surveillance detected at anti-ICE protest
Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 8 months agoThen don’t take a phone. If you’re an organizer who needs to communicate, get a wifi/bt only tablet, look up mesh networks that use bluetooth and wifi, learn encryption and learn code words.
It’s trivial to jam any wireless network. All jamming is it to flood the rf range with loud static. But you can still take measures to keep from being spied on.
I used to watch The Hated One, who has also made similar recommendations for strikes. He has suggested the use of Briar, as it can fallback to Bluetooth connectivity.
However, I mostly wanted to point out that burner phones is not the answer for everyone. People need to be familiar with their local laws to stay safe.
Isn’t Bluetooth a bad idea because it’s bouncing off nearby phones and reporting your position?
Honestly, I think it’s best to put it (preferable a burner phone and not your everyday phone) in a faraday bag and don’t use it unless absolutely necessary and if you want to take photos/video, buy a 2000s era digicam from eBay.
Curious_Canid@lemmy.ca 8 months ago
We got some Meshtastic radios that we use for protests (as well as for protests). They solve most of the problems quite neatly.
cdf12345@lemmy.zip 8 months ago
As long as it’s a self contained communication version and doesn’t require using the meshtadtic phone app
Curious_Canid@lemmy.ca 8 months ago
I’m getting a T-Deck, but I don’t feel too bad about using Bluetooth on a phone, as long as everything else is disabled. It isn’t hard to track, but it will be a distant third after cell and Wifi in terms of what the authorities will be tracking. Not ideal, but an acceptable compromise for now.