Comment on Gyroid infil appreciation post

lapis@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

• JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Is adaptive cubic different than cubic?

  cubic and gyroid seem to take the same time while having almost the same failure load

  source

  • PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks [bot] ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Here is an alternative Piped link(s): piped.video/watch?v=upELI0HmzHc&

    Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

    I’m open-source, check me out at GitHub.

    source
• Carighan@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  True, although the idea is to print significantly less of it because of how sturdy it is.

  source
• Jtskywalker@lemm.ee ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Same. Sometimes you want something fast. For things that don’t need to be sturdy at all (little display figures and stuff like that) I’ll use cubic or even lightning infil

  source

  • newIdentity@sh.itjust.works ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    You could also just use a lower infill percentage since it’s stronger

    source

    • Jtskywalker@lemm.ee ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      There’s a type of cubic that starts out lower and increases in density as it reaches the top to support the top layers. That’s mainly the one I was thinking of. I can’t remember the name of it though. And lightning is suuuper fast but provides basically no strength

      source