Are you comparing that to a time that everyone stopped eating beef or how are you using that information to make the claim that meat isn’t the problem?
FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 1 week ago
I don’t buy it.
In 2008 when the travel industry crashed in the wake of the market crash, and again in 2020, we saw significant decreases in pollution.
Meat isn’t the problem. Fossil fuels are.
BussyCat@lemmy.world 1 week ago
FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 1 week ago
I’m pointing to observable cause-and-effect.
BussyCat@lemmy.world 1 week ago
That is the classic problem of a correlation. If you are sitting in a room that is warm and you notice that when you are using your laptop the room is slightly warmer and when your laptop is off the room is slightly cooler would you say that the driving force for the temperature of the room is your laptop? Or could it also be the oven, the outside temperature, the heating/air conditioning, the number of people in the room, etc. we do have enough evidence that global air travel is a significant contributor to ghg and therefore climate change but it’s estimated to be 2.5% compared to agriculture which is 10%
commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 week ago
Are you comparing that to a time that everyone stopped eating beef
like the mid-90’s mad cow scare?
BussyCat@lemmy.world 1 week ago
What was the reduction in beef consumption world wide compared to the reduction in ghg?
commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 week ago
dam. if only there were charts that show meat production and ghge
EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 1 week ago
There is not one thing that is the problem. It’s a bunch of big problems adding up into a colossal one.
CXORA@aussie.zone 1 week ago
More than one thing can contribute.